Blog Post
Restorative


Cavity adaptation refers to the ability of a restorative material to seamlessly adapt to the preparation. What’s more, based on a recent survey, two thirds of dentists consider cavity adaptation the most important factor in clinical success. In Class II restorations, the proximal box presents particular challenges for cavity adaptation. Here we’ll look at the impact of poor cavity adaptation on clinical outcomes for Class II composite restorations, the factors influencing cavity adaptation and how to achieve gap-free cavity adaptation.  

Cavity Adaptation and Clinical Outcomes  

Poor cavity adaptation causes gaps and voids at the interface of the restorative material and the tooth structure, as well as internal voids. Adverse clinical outcomes of poor cavity adaptation include:2

  • Marginal leakage.
  • Post-operative sensitivity.
  • Pulpal irritation.
  • Recurrent caries.
  • Restoration failure.   

While a patient’s caries risk influences the development of recurrent caries, poor adaptation also plays a significant role.3 The main reason for Class II restoration failure is recurrent caries, and up to 90% of recurrent caries lesions occur at the gingival margins.3,4 Given that 50% of all direct restorations are Class IIs,5 it’s crucial to understand the factors that influence cavity adaptation and how to achieve gap-free restorations.

 

Factors Influencing Cavity Adaptation 

Factors influencing cavity adaptation include the shape of the preparation, the properties of the restorative material, and operator technique. 

 

Preparation Shape 

Cavity adaptation is influenced by the shape of the preparation and the number of surfaces involved.6 The ratio of bonded surfaces (walls) to unbonded surfaces - known as the configuration factor or C-factor – affects cavity adaptation. Challenging sites include the depth of a proximal box and areas with sharp line angles between the floor of the preparation and the axial wall. Procedures involving replacement of amalgam restorations also represent challenges because the preparations frequently have surface irregularities.2 In particular, the cavity depth, width and volume are found to be related to the quantity of gaps and voids when using high viscosity composites.7

 

Composite Restorative Material

1.   Flowability of the Composite: 

Most universal composites are formulated with a high viscosity that allows them to be sculpted to mimic the anatomy of natural teeth. However, their high viscosity impacts their ability to achieve intimate cavity adaptation even with a suitable operator technique. It’s been shown that lower viscosity flowable composites improve cavity adaptation over high viscosity composites.8

 

2.   Polymerization and Stress:

All light-cured composites contain photoinitiators that initiate polymerization when the composite is exposed to energy emitted from the curing light.  When polymerization is initiated, monomers in the composite join together to form polymers and a network of polymer chains containing the composite’s filler particles develops. Chemically, this is achieved as double bonds in the monomer progressively convert into single bonds.7 Polymerization inherently causes shrinkage of materials. Since restorative composites are bonded to preparation walls their ability to shrink is curtailed, causing polymerization stress (shrinkage stress) to develop. The higher the C-factor, the higher the stress is likely to be – indicating that Class I and II restorations as well as filling of endo access cavities are at considerable risk.

Polymerization stress causes the bonded preparation walls to be pulled towards the composite (tensile force) within the preparation.2 When we think of something glued to a wall, pulling on that item may release it when the glue (bond) breaks or when the underlying part of the wall distorts and comes away with it. Similar failures can occur with bonded composite restorations.

Clinically, polymerization stress can result in the following adverse events:

  • Debonding – leading to microleakage and potential for marginal staining, sensitivity, recurrent caries and pulpal irritation.
  • Enamel fractures.
  • Cuspal deflection, cracked cusps, cuspal fractures.
  • Restoration failure.

 

Composite attributes that influence polymerization stress include the type of composite and its formulation. That makes careful selection of composite a crucial factor for cavity adaptation. Lastly, selecting a reliable adhesive system that offers excellent bond strength is important since this helps to counter the stress by resisting separation from the tooth structure and composite.

Let’s now look at the impact of operator technique on cavity adaptation.

Operator Technique

Poor operator technique significantly affects clinical outcomes.

In the case of universal/posterior composites, which have a high viscosity, applying insufficient or misplaced pressure during placement reduces ‘packing’ of the composite, thereby increasing the likelihood of gaps at the margins and along the walls of the preparation. Methods used to reduce the viscosity of composites during placement include vibration and pre-heating of the material. Both of these techniques are controversial due to variability in the effect across composites (unless recommended by the manufacturer) and, in the case of pre-heating, the potentially unfavorable influence of heated composite on pulpal health.6

Low viscosity flowable composites are advantageous for cavity adaptation. Nonetheless, attention to detail is necessary. Placement is optimized when the material is initially syringed into the preparation at the deepest part of the proximal box and then gradually withdrawn while still syringing and keeping the application tip within the flowable material as it fills the preparation. Holding the tip within the flowable composite only intermittently can cause air to be trapped within the material and lead to the formation of gaps and voids.  

Light-curing the Composite 

 

Failure to obtain an adequate degree of conversion and depth of cure negatively impacts clinical outcomes such as marginal leakage or, in some cases, wash-out of composite material, resulting in gaps.3 The floor of the proximal box in Class II restorations is often as much as 8 mm or more away from the tip of the curing light, making it particularly vulnerable.

Additionally, universal/posterior composites require the placement of small increments of material of up to 2 mm to allow for adequate curing and to properly manage polymerization shrinkage stress.  It may be tempting to take short cuts, but exceeding the recommended thickness of an incremental layer is an error that can result in undercuring and failure. One of the advantages of bulk fill composites is the ability to obtain adequate depth of cure up to 4-5 mm, thanks to their formulation and the use of specific photoinitiators.

It goes without saying that for all composites, the composite manufacturer’s recommendations for curing should be followed.

Cavity Adaptation with Bulk Fill Flowable


Using a bulk fill flowable composites with a low viscosity and good flowability enables intimate contact with preparation walls, including the proximal box of deep Class II restorations.

Bulk filling is possible thanks to adequate balance between light transmission, initiator content and wave length recommended for curing to allow greater depth of cure than with traditional universal composites. As such, the number of layers required and the risk of internal voids between layers is reduced. Plus, due to their low viscosity of bulk-fill flowables in particular, application is relatively easy and efficient. This provides an efficiency advantage especially when treating  patients where limited chairside time may be tolerated – such as children, geriatric patients and individuals with some medical conditions or disabilities.   

It’s clear that the preparation form, composite selection and operator technique all play a role in cavity adaptation. Selecting a low viscosity bulk fill flowable composite with low polymerization stress helps you meet the challenges of cavity adaptation, while also simplifying the procedure and increasing efficiency for your practice. 

Achieve Excellent Cavity Adaptation with Help from Dentsply Sirona

Choosing a suitable composite, adhesive system and curing light is crucial for the success of composite restorations. With Dentsply Sirona’s SDR® flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable and Prime&Bond active® Universal Dental Adhesive, together with the SmartLite® Pro Modular LED Curing Light, you can reliably achieve gap-free cavity adaptation.  

 

SDR® flow+ material and the bulk fill technique is proven to be safe, effective and clinically durable compared to conventional layering techniques9-10. What’s more, it’s the most researched bulk fill material available10. This flowable bulk fill composite makes it possible to achieve excellent marginal adaptation, with the following features:

  • Low viscosity and flowability result in reliable filling.
  • Self-leveling material provides for easy and faster application without agitation, helping to ensure excellent marginal integrity.
  • Easy and controlled delivery with a precise application tip for access to the site, accurate and void-free placement.
  • Fast bulk fill placement of up to 4 mm in depth, resulting in fewer steps and up to 40% reduced placement time.11
  • Patented SDR® Technology that effectively dissipates energy during polymerization and results in a more relaxed polymer network, minimizing polymerization stress even with a 4 mm increment. 

SDR® flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable also offers versatility. It can be used for Class 1 and II restorations as a base layer in an open or closed sandwich technique, together with an overlay of universal/posterior composite. As a stand-alone bulk fill restorative material, it can be used for Class I, III and V restorations

Using Prime&Bond active® Universal Dental Adhesive together with SDR® flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable material further alleviates the challenges of adaptation. This low viscosity and low film thickness material seamlessly adapts to cavity walls and flows easily into every nook and cranny. What’s more, Prime&Bond active® Universal Dental Adhesive offers high bond strength under varying moisture levels, for a reliable bond and virtually no post-operative sensitivity.

Adequate light-curing is always a must have and that’s where the SmartLite® Pro Modular LED Curing Light comes in! It’s designed to offer leading quality of cure thanks to excellent beam collimation, a large 10 mm active curing diameter, and state of the art optics with an optimized 4 LED design that provides for a homogeneous beam over the entire active curing area. Ergonomics is built in with a slim pen-style design that provides for excellent intraoral access and makes it easier to maintain the proper curing angle. 

Selecting Dentsply Sirona’s SDR® flow+ Bulk Fill Flowable and Prime&Bond active® Universal Dental Adhesive together with the SmartLite® Pro Modular LED Curing Light is a win-win for you, your patients and your practice!  

Here at Dentsply Sirona we want to support you further with our entire online dental academy complete with webinars, how-to videos, and real-world examples on how to create streamlined solutions with efficient procedures and even greater patient satisfaction. Contact us now and let’s get started!

References

Askar H, Krois J, Göstemeyer G. et al. Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?. Clin Oral Invest. 2020;24:1869–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03268-7.

Elgezawi M, Haridy R, Abdalla MA et al. Current Strategies to Control Recurrent and Residual Caries with Resin Composite Restorations: Operator- and Material-Related Factors. J Clin Med. 2022;11(21):6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216591.

Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N. Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review. J Dent Biomech. 2010;2010:131630. doi: 10.4061/2010/131630.

1 Key Group International Survey, 2019, n=300. For more information, contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com.

2 Schneider LF, Cavalcante LM, Silikas N. Shrinkage Stresses Generated during Resin-Composite Applications: A Review. J Dent Biomech. 2010;2010:131630. doi: 10.4061/2010/131630.

3 Askar H, Krois J, Göstemeyer G. et al. Secondary caries: what is it, and how it can be controlled, detected, and managed?. Clin Oral Invest 2020;24:1869–1876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03268-7.

4 Al-Asmar AA, Al-Khatib KM, Al-Amad TZ, Sawair FA. Has the implementation of the Minamata convention had an impact on the practice of operative dentistry in Jordan? J Int Med Res. 2019 Jan;47(1):361-369. doi: 10.1177/0300060518802523. Epub 2018 Oct 3. PMID: 30282511; PMCID: PMC6384461.

5 Market IQ 2022 Research Report -  Calendar Year 2021. For more information, contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com

6 Elgezawi M, Haridy R, Abdalla MA et al. Current Strategies to Control Recurrent and Residual Caries with Resin Composite Restorations: Operator- and Material-Related Factors. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2022; 11(21):6591. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11216591.

7 Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E. Determinants of in vitro gap formation of resin composites. J Dent 2004;32:109-15.

8 Moreira da Silva E, dos Santos GO, Guimarães JG, Barcellos Ade A, Sampaio EM. The influence of C-factor, flexural modulus and viscous flow on gap formation in resin composite restorations. Oper Dent 2007;32:356-62

9 van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, 2017: Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation.; Eur J Oral Sci. 2017 Aug;125(4):303-309.

10 van Dijken JWV, Pallesen U, 2016: Posterior bulk-filled resin composite restorations: A 5-year randomized controlled clinical study; J Dent 2016 Aug;51:29-35

11 Internal data on file. For more information, contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com


Related Articles