Blog Post
Restorative


Along with the endodontic treatment itself, we know that coronal restorations influence the long-term success of endodontically treated teeth. Based on one large study, the success rate for endodontically treated teeth was 96% over eight years, while 85% of the failures were due to poor coronal coverage.1 This data highlights how critical good restorative care is for successful outcomes in endodontically treated teeth. Here, we’ll review the role of a post, and when a post and core build-up should/should not be placed.

The role of a post 

A post is defined by the American Association of Endodontists as ‘A custom or preformed rod that is fitted and cemented into the root canal of an endodontically treated tooth for core retention.2

The traditional role of a post is to retain a core build-up when insufficient coronal tooth structure remains to support the core. Glass fiber posts adhesively luted are now considered the gold standard.

 

When to place a post vs. when not to place a post

Two primary factors must be considered in determining whether a post should be placed are:

  • The amount of tooth structure, marginal ridges and number of walls remaining.
  • The position of the tooth in the dental arch.

In addition, the presence of risk factors predisposing endodontically treated teeth to fracture influences clinical decision-making. Here we’ll first look at clinical recommendations generally indicated, using a minimally invasive approach when possible, and then consider the risk factors.

Can a direct composite restoration be placed?

When loss of coronal tooth structure is minimal, one marginal ridge remains intact and no pre-existing cracks are present, it may be possible to place a bonded direct restoration in an endodontically treated tooth.3

  • Minimally invasive dentistry supports the placement of direct resin-based composite restorations in incisors, premolar and molars if only one ridge has been lost.3,4
  • Cuspal thickness must be considered – one study showed that the long-term outcomes for direct class II posterior composite restorations with 2.5 to 3 millimeters of cusp thickness in endodontically treated teeth were clinically acceptable and comparable to those of vital teeth.4

If a direct restoration is being placed, no post is needed.

 

If an indirect restoration is necessary, when is a post needed?

 

An indirect restoration is needed when both ridges are lost, one wall remains, or no walls remain. The assessment of coronal walls must be based on what will remain after tooth preparation. It’s essential to visualize what the remaining tooth structure will look like after preparation. How many coronal walls will remain, and will the walls be sufficiently thick? For example, caries removal during preparation may result in thin and/or fewer coronal walls.

The type of indirect restoration and need for a post is then evaluated based on the number of walls present and whether the tooth is an incisor, premolar or molar, as follows:

  • Incisors– A post is needed as well as a ferrule and crown if both ridges are missing, only one wall remains, or no walls remain.
  • Premolars a post is always needed if both ridges are missing, only one wall or no walls remain regardless of whether a single-unit crown is indicated or cuspal coverage (an adhesively luted onlay, partial crown or standard crown). A ferrule and single-unit crown are always needed if no walls remain. 
  • Molars a post is always needed if no walls remain, along with a ferrule and single-unit crown. Cuspal coverage without placement of a post may be possible if both ridges are lost or at least one wall remains (in contrast to incisors and premolars, molars present with more residual hard tissue). (Table 1)

If a post is needed, which type of post is best?

Options for posts include custom/pre-fabricated metal or ceramic posts as well as carbon fiber posts and glass fiber posts. Research supports the use of a tapered glass fiber post as the gold standard, with a modulus of elasticity (stiffness), coefficient of thermal expansion and compressive strength similar to root dentin. Overall, glass fiber posts exhibit:

  1. An overall survival rate of 92.8% compared to 78.1% for metal posts5
  2. Non-catastrophic failure rate of 14.2%, compared to 22.6% for carbon fiber posts and 22.1% for cast metal posts5
  3. Catastrophic failure rates similar to cast metal posts (3.6% vs 3.4%) and much lower than carbon fiber posts or prefabricated metal posts.5

 

Clinical decision-making and risk factors predisposing endodontically treated teeth to fracture 

 

Based on the presence/absence of risk factors predisposing endodontically treated teeth to fracture, as determined during the patient evaluation, clinical decision-making may determine that treatment with a post and full-coverage crown is preferable even if the tooth position and amount of tooth structure available suggests otherwise. (Table 1)

Risk factors for fracture of endodontically treated teeth include heavy forces/loads, periodontal disease and increasing age.

Heavy forces/loads can be the result of the following :

  • An unfavorable occlusal scheme where there is deviation from canine guidance and a proper envelope of function.
  • Anterior teeth subjected to heavy oblique or lateral loads; a deep overbite may be present.
  • Heavy bite force – this causes occlusal overloading of posterior teeth. Even for an average individual, bite force can be more than 200 lbs.3,6
  • Occlusal overloading caused by poor dietary habits such as crunching on hard foods, snacks or ice.
  • Parafunctional habits such as clenching, grinding or nocturnal bruxing.
  • An absence of adjacent teeth.

Periodontal status and age of the patient:The risk of fracture increases for periodontally involved teeth, and in patients in their mid-60s and older as their teeth gradually become more brittle.4

Table 1. When to place a post for endodontically treated teeth based on cavity configuration

When should a core build-up be performed?

 

The role of the core is to retain a crown. A core build-up is usually placed when more than half of the coronal tooth structure is missing and deemed to be insufficient for retention of the indirect restoration. When a fiber post is selected to retain the core build-up, its taper helps to preserve tooth structure in the root canal and the post can be adhesively bonded to both the tooth structure and the core build-up.   Selecting a fiber post helps with clinical success when a post is needed, with a 2.7-fold reduced risk of failure found for all-ceramic crowns in one study and significant reductions in failure rates for premolars in a second study.7,8 

 

In summary, knowing when and when not to place a post and core build-up is essential for an optimized restorative treatment plan and clinical success. When a post is needed, selecting a fiber post is a gold standard that helps in achieving favorable long-term outcomes for endodontically treated teeth.

 

Achieve Long-term Success for Endodontically Treated Teeth with Help from Dentsply Sirona

 

Here at Dentsply Sirona we want to support you with products that help you achieve successful long-term outcomes for endodontically treated teeth. That’s where Dentsply Sirona’s FluoroPost™ Endodontic Fiber Post, Fluorocore® 2+ Core Build-Up and Prime&Bond active® Universal Adhesive come in, together meeting your post, core build-up and adhesive needs.

 

Best Post to Use

When you need to place a post, Dentsply Sirona’s FluoroPost™ Endodontic Fiber Post is a glass fiber post that delivers high bond strength9 without any extra pre-treatment such as sandblasting to treat the surface. Glass fiber posts keep catastrophic and restorable fracture rates low, increasing the overall longevity and success of your final crown restoration.5 The tapered shape of this post perfectly fits to the provided precision drill helping you achieve a precise fit, and with a modulus of elasticity similar to dentin a high level of fatigue resistance and reduced stress is achieved.10

 

Best Core Material to Use

Dentsply Sirona’s Fluorocore® 2+ Core Build-Up is both an ideal build-up material and post cement. With its high bond strength and strong dark cure it delivers reliable bonding,11 and for core build-ups provides high compressivtensile, and flexural strengths.12 Fluorocore® 2+ Core Build-Up properties also delivers following:

  • Dual curing
    • Reliable dark cure deep into the root canal
    • Convenience of light cure for the upper part of the core build-up
  • Cuts like dentin and easy to use
  • Good radiopacity for radiographs
  • Dual-purpose for convenience
 
Best Adhesive to Use

For long-lasting results excellent bonding of the indirect restoration is also required. Dentsply Sirona’s Prime&Bond active® adhesive offers a low film thickness, versatility, and can be used with all etching techniques. When combined with the Self-Cure Activator, the mixture can be used for priming the post as well as well as adhesive within the post space and for bonding the core build-up.

Here at Dentsply Sirona we want to support you further with our entire online dental academy complete with webinars, how-to videos, and real-world examples on how to create streamlined solutions with efficient procedures and even greater patient satisfaction. Contact us now and let’s get started!

 

1Salehrabi R, Rotstein I. Endodontic treatment Outcome of 1.47 million ETT: An epidemiological study. Journal of Endodontics, Dec 2004.

2American Association of Endodontists. Glossary of Endodontic Terms. Tenth Edition. https://www.aae.org/specialty/clinical-resources/glossary-endodontic-terms/.

3Atlas A, Grandini S, Martignoni M. Evidence-based treatment planning for the restoration of endodontically treated single teeth: importance of coronal seal, post vs no post, and indirect vs direct restoration. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(10):772-781.

4Lempel E, Lovász BV, Bihari E, Krajczár K, Jeges S, Tóth Á, Szalma J. Long-term clinical evaluation of direct resin composite restorations in vital vs. endodontically treated posterior teeth - Retrospective study up to 13 years. Dent Mater. 2019 Sep;35(9):1308-1318.

5Figueiredo et. al.: Do metal-post retained restorations result in more root fractures than fiber post retained restorations? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JOE 2015, Vol 41, 3: 309-316.

6American Association of Endodontists. Treatment Standards (2020). Available at: https://www.aae.org/specialty/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2018/04/TreatmentStandards_Whitepaper.pdf.

7Wierichs RJ, Kramer EJ, Reiss B, Schwendicke F, Krois J, Meyer-Lueckel H, Wolf TG. A prospective, multi-center, practice-based cohort study on all-ceramic crowns. Dent Mater. 2021 Aug;37(8):1273-1282.

8Ferrari M, Vichi A, Fadda GM, Cagidiaco MC, Tay FR, Breschi L, Polimeni A, Goracci C. A randomized controlled trial of endodontically treated and restored premolars. J Dent Res. 2012 Jul;91(7 Suppl):72S-78S.

9Wagner T. et al., Influence of different post surface treatments on bond strengths of glass fiber posts in root canals (DGZ 2008, Abstract 0049).

10Boksman L. et al., 2013: The Clinical Significance of Mechanical Properties in Retentive Posts,dentalaegis.com Compendium June 2013 Volume 34, Issue 6: 446 - 455.

11Spicciarelli V, Ounsi HF, Ferrari M, Corsentino G, Marruganti C, Grandini S. Push-out Bond Strength of Fiber Posts Cemented Using New Universal Adhesives on Etched and Nonetched Intraradicular Dentin. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jan 1;21(1):91-96. PMID: 32381808.

12Internal data on file. For more information, contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com


Related Articles