The Reciproc® family

Three heroes. One mission: Striving for efficiency.

Imagine true one-file endo is possible without increased risk and higher clinical success rates.

Designed to enable shaping without the need for an additional scouting or glidepath instrument in most cases, the Reciproc family offers you efficiency in time saving through real one-file endo.1 On top of it the Reciproc family is one of the most heavily researched NiTi systems worldwide with more than 650 peer reviewed publications2 and clinically proven long-term benefits.3

Why choose Reciproc family files for root canal shaping?

Time savings

Having a reduced sequence of just one file in the majority of cases compared to multiple files in a sequence, allows the possibility that shaping the canal takes less time. Time savings can lead to less stress for the dentist and his team or could be reinvested in additional treatments

Organization

One file endo simplifies inventory and storage management

Cost savings

Less files in a clinical sequence and time savings can lead to reduced cost per treatment compared to systems that require the use of multiple files in a sequence.

Peace of mind

Even inexperienced dental assistants could easily handle the setup before and during the treatment – without hesitation about which file to hand to the clinician next.

Root canal shaping: one does it all

S-Shaped cross-section & non-cutting tip

Designed for one file endo, so a root canal can be prepared without creating an initial glidepath in the majority of cases.1

The Reciproc and Reciproc Blue endodontic files have matching paper points as well as Conform Fit® Gutta-Percha points for a precise fit and and accurate tug back. 

Higher clinical success rates

Clinically proven long-term benefits:3

In a 10-year clinical study including 14 233 treated teeth, treatment protocol including Reciproc showed a 30-40% higher survival rate and a 66% lower need for retreatment compared to protocols with rotary sequences or hand instruments.

The Reciproc family experience

Reciproc Blue

The Allrounder – Flexible and strong for everyday. The universal and flexible instrument for the majority of cases incl. retreatments.

Reciproc Minima

The Precisionist – Sleek for challenging cases. The next gen. Slim and agile – the ideal choice for narrow and challenging canals.

Reciproc

The Pioneer – Tough and unyielding. The instrument for everyone who prefers a slightly stiffer file for retreatment thanks to m-wire.

How to

Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:

For more details, please revisit the IFU.

Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:

For more details, please revisit the IFU.

Building on Reciproc heriatage, Reciproc Minima is the ideal choice for narrow and challenging canals. The procedure should start with instrument size R20. In cases of wider canal anatomy, the selection of the initial instrument size is at the clinicians discretion.

Step 1:
Step 2:
Step 3:
Step 4:
Step 5:
Step 6:
Step 7:
Step 8:
Step 9:
Step 10:
Step 11:

For more details, please revisit the IFU.

Find the Reciproc file for your needs

Treatment
Key Benefits
Material
Taper Options
Working Length
Cross-section
Flexibility
Special Features
Reciproc
Treatment

For retreatment

Key Benefits

Stiffer file (m-wire) for retreatment

Material

M-Wire NiTi with patented thermal treatment

Taper Options

R25 (0.25 mm, taper .08), R40 (0.40 mm, taper .06), R50 (0.50 mm, taper .05)

Working Length

21 mm, 25 mm, 31 mm

Cross-section

S-shaped cross-section

Flexibility

Moderate flexibility suitable for retreatments

Special Features

Single-use design reduces cross-contamination

Reciproc Blue
Treatment

For regular anatomies and wider root canals

Key Benefits

Universal and flexible instrument for the majority of cases

Material

Heat-treated NiTi with improved flexibility and resistance to fatigue

Taper Options

R25 (0.25 mm, taper .08), R40 (0.40 mm, taper .06), R50 (0.50 mm, taper .05)

Working Length

21 mm, 25 mm, 31 mm

Cross-section

S-shaped cross-section 

Flexibility

Blue heat treated NiTi improves flexibility and centering abilities of the file to reduce canal transportation.

Special Features

Prebendable for easier access 

Reciproc Minima
Treatment

For narrow and challenging canals

Key Benefits

Sleek for challenging cases

Material

Heat-treated NiTi with improved flexibility and resistance to fatigue

Taper Options

Average taper along the file:

R20: 3.6%

(MFD: 0.77mm)

R25: 3.3%

R35: 2.6%

R45: 2.0%

Working Length

21 mm, 25 mm, 31 mm

Cross-section

S-shaped cross-section

Flexibility

Blue heat treated NiTi improves flexibility and centering abilities of the file to reduce canal transportation.

Special Features

Slim and agile- goes where others can’t

Related products

X-Smart Pro+ 
R-Pilot
Irrigation Needle
SmartLite Pro EndoActivator
AH Plus Jet

Frequently asked questions

First introduced on the market in 2010 by Dentsply Sirona through Maillefer and VDW with WaveOne and Reciproc, the reciprocating motion replicates the manual back and forth motion, “the balance technique”.5 When it turns one way (counterclockwise), it cuts (engages). When it turns the other way (clockwise), it stops cutting (disengages) and gets ready to cut again. After it does this back-and-forth three times, it has made one full circle!

The disengagement of the instrument occurs before excessive torsional stress is transferred onto the metal alloy and before the instrument can bind (taper lock) into the root canal, providing some advantages over continuous rotations systems:

a. Reduction of torsional stress and reduced risks of instrument separation6

b. Progression to the apex without applying too much force (which could be risky or harmful)7

c. Enhanced debris removal8

Reciproc Blue is heat treated which results in its blue color and increased flexibility of 40% compared to Reciproc. Furthermore, Reciproc Blue is more resistant to cyclic fatigue.

R25 regressive taper .08

R40 regressive taper .06

R50 regressive taper .05

Lengths: 21 mm, 25 mm, 31 mm

More confidence in single-visit endo

Scientific downloads

Original article | Tooth survival | Int. Endodontic Journal | EN
Elmaasarawi A, Mekhemar M, Bartols A. Influence of different endodontic treatment protocols on tooth survival: A retrospective cohort study with multistate analysis and group balancing. Int Endod J. 2025 Jun 13. Distributed under the terms of the creative commons attribution 4.0 International licences (CC by 4.0)
3 MB
Reciproc® Family | Scientific Highlights - Literature Review | EN
So far, more than 650 peer-reviewed scientific papers have been published on this endodontic system, with various topics of interest as shown in the figure below, making Reciproc ® family one of the most extensively studied NiTi treatment solution in the endodontic field.
384 KB
Reciproc® Family | Scientific Highlights - Clinical Evidence | EN
Peer-reviewed clinical evidence with Reciproc family: “Influence of different endodontic treatment protocols on tooth survival: A retrospective cohort study with multistate analysis and group balancing”
101 KB
Reciproc® Family | Scientific Manual | EN
This scientific manual serves as a comprehensive compilation, distilling the most significant publications on the Reciproc® concept.
2 MB

Product downloads

The Reciproc® Family | Brochure | EN
Three heroes. One mission: Striving for efficiency .
3 MB
Reciproc® Blue | Solution Guide | EN
Reciproc Blue Sequence and Step-by-Step procedure
377 KB
Reciproc® family | Tip card | EN
Reciproc® Blue Shaping, Cleaning, Obturation.
340 KB
Reciproc Minima® | Solution Guide | EN
Reciproc Minima sequence and shaping files technique.
1 MB

For instructions for use, safety data sheets, eMDR documents and more, visit our Download Center

What are dentists saying about Reciproc family products?  

“The centering ability of the reciprocation motion, and the design of the Reciproc Blue instrument and its enhanced physical properties allow the Reciproc Blue to follow the path of least resistance, which is the canal, without any prior instrumentation, and to be used efficiently for the preparation of strongly curved and calcified canals without a glide path.” 

 

Prof. Ghassan Yared, Canada 

Contact us

1. Zuolo, M.L., M.C. Carvalho, and G. De-Deus, Negotiability of Second Mesiobuccal Canals in Maxillary Molars Using a Reciprocating System. J Endod, 2015. 41(11): p. 1913-7. Based on treatment of MB2 canals of more than 300 patients. The aim was to assess the frequency in which Reciproc® R25 was able to directly scout and reach working lengths in comparison with hand files. In the hand file group working length was successfully reached in 57.48%. In the Reciproc® R25 group the working length was successfully reached in 85.63% of cases.  

2.  > 650 peer reviewed publications (number of publications on the Reciproc® family from PubMed (key words: Reciproc(title/ abstract), on June 30, 2023) 

3. Elmaasarawi A, Mekhemar M, Bartols A. Influence of different endodontic treatment protocols on tooth survival: A retrospective cohort study with multistate analysis and group balancing. Int Endod J. 2025 Jun 13. doi: 10.1111/iej.14271. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 40509940.

4. On-going study (CRE 24-04) “The Influence of Operator Experience in the Performance and Fracture Rate of Minima Instruments” Prof. De-Deus, Fluminense Federal University (Brazil). Internal data on file. For more information, contact Consumables-Data-Requests@dentsplysirona.com.

5. J. Roane, et al. The Balance force concept for instrumentation of curved canals. J. of Endodontics, 1985 TI (5): p203 211

6. Compared to rotary mechanized preparation. Influence of the Pecking Motion Frequency on the Cyclic Fatigue Resistance of Endodontic Rotary Files. Zubizarreta-Macho et al, available under https7/www.ncbLnlm.nih.gov4jmaarticies/PMC7020()62/

7. Yared, G, Canal preparation using only one Ni-Ti rotary instrument preliminary observations. Int Endod J, 2008.41(4): p 339-44

8. De-Deus, G., et al. Apically extruded dentin debris by reciprocating single-file and multi-file rotary System. Clinical Oral Investigations, 2015 19(2): p. 357-361

9. Kanter V, Weldon E, Nair U, et al. A quantitative and qualitative analysis of ultrasonic versus sonic endodontic systems on canal cleanliness and obturation. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(6):809- 813.doi:10.1016/j.tripleo. 2011.06.002